Kilian Feldbausch vs Marko Topo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Top performance under pressure is seen in Topo's ability to save breakpoints, with a success rate of 60.62%, compared to Feldbausch at 47.84%. Could this give Topo an edge in decisive moments?
• Topo exhibits superiority in second serve points, winning 44.75%, over Feldbausch's 39.96%. How might this influence the match when the first serve percentage falters?
• Feldbausch outshines Topo in return games, especially against second serves, capturing 51.17% of points compared to Topo's 44.43%.
• Over the past year, Topo holds a higher match-winning percentage at 67.65%, slightly outperforming Feldbausch's 61.04%.
• Surfaces could be decisive; while Topo excels on Hard with 66% wins, Feldbausch has shown preference for Clay, securing 60% victories.
• In tournament play level, Feldbausch has fared better in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events with a 75.68% win ratio, trumping Topo's 63.89% in Challenger/ITF matches.
• Though they face different levels of opponent ranking, Feldbausch tends to compete against slightly higher-ranked players, with an average rank of 407.23, compared to Topo's 462.68.
• Performance in deciding sets appears evenly matched with Feldbausch winning 44% and Topo capturing 43% of such situations.
• In terms of break point conversion, Feldbausch marginally leads with a conversion rate of 36.52% compared to Topo's 33.33%.

Editorial Prediction (September 12, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Topo and Feldbausch delves into several areas where both players have shown distinct strengths and weaknesses.

Topo's strength lies in their capability to handle pressure points effectively, evident in their significant breakpoint defense. Meanwhile, Feldbausch's proficiency in return games, both on first and second serves, suggests a potential advantage in dictating baseline exchanges.

The match promises intrigue with Topo's prowess on hard courts against Feldbausch's consistent performance on clay. Additionally, Feldbausch's superior win rate in smaller-scale tournaments and higher-level competition experience presents a competitive edge.

Given the comparative analysis of these factors, Feldbausch is slightly favored to secure the victory in this contest.